|
Safety News
Griffin Filters Unveils NFPA-68 Compliant Dust Collectors Griffin Filters, a subsidiary of Cemtrex rele... NORFOLK ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE SERVICES THE JOURNEY TO COMPLIANCE
CHS Receives Prestigious OSHA Award For Environmental, Health & Safety Services at Kennedy Space Center Comprehensive Health Services, Inc. (CHS), a ... SYSPRO Releases New Document Management Software for Mid-Market Manufacturers SYSPRO, a provider of visionary ERP for the m... CHS Receives Prestigious OSHA Award For Environmental, Health & Safety Services at Kennedy Space Center Comprehensive Health Services, Inc. (CHS), a ... OSHA and the American Foundry Society renew Alliance The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational S... |
|
New Safety Challenge Questions now posted! Click on Safety Challenge to view them.
On January 2, 1990, the
federal government adopted 29CFR 1910.147, the Control of Hazardous
Energy. The more common name for this standard is Lockout/Tagout.
The premise of the standard was simple; each employee should
be able to control their own safety while performing servicing
or maintenance of machines and equipment. Each individual in
the workplace should be trained to one of three levels of competency
and only the employees trained to the level of Authorized could
perform lockout. |
|
As we enter our 18th year since that standard
has been adopted, we are finding that there are still serious
problems understanding the regulation, developing a solution
for the standard and implementing solutions. In 2005, the
most frequently cited federal OSHA standard was 29 CFR 1910.147,
the Control of Hazardous Energy, and Lockout/Tagout. From
October 2004 to September 2005, OSHA conducted 6622 workplace
inspections, and assessed industry $46,985,059.00 in proposed
fines and penalties. Fines for lockout violations totaled
$2,806,026.00 or 6% of the total dollars fined. There were
3,452 citations for lockout violations with an average dollar
figure of $812.00 per citation.
|
Where is the lockout point in the image?
|
|
So what is the problem and why after 15 years is lockout
the number one most frequently cited regulation? Why does
this seem so complicated? Is it understanding the standard
or is it behavior? How does engineering and workplace design
factor into lockout? What role does management play into this
problem? So many questions to answer, and all of them play
a part in why lockout is the most frequently cited regulation.
In the Services section, there is a more detailed discussion
of lockout tagout. It will include tips on developing and
implementing effective lockout programs and perhaps answer
some other questions that you might have about lockout. It
also provides you an opportunity to ask us questions that
you might have, including specific questions about effective
equipment design and installation for good lockout, or questions
about the procedure to follow. In addition, one of the Safety
Challenge questions is directly related to lockout, so take
the challenge, and see how good your lockout/tagout skills
are.
|
|